Skip to content
BetNest NZ

The Worst Games of the Year 2025, Per Review Aggregator Metacritic

Across the internet, gamers are quick to share their selections of the greatest releases of 2025. However, what of the flops, the underperformers? We'll take a moment to recognize the absolute worst games of the year, as determined by the aggregate scores from Metacritic. Could each of these games as disappointing as their scores suggest? Let's find out.

10. Welcome Tour for Switch 2

Metascore: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this pack-in experience were shaped by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a bundled game like competing console launches. Professional assessment varied dramatically, from "crushing disappointment" to more generous reviews that highlighted the delightful software itself. Despite the debate, the title proved to be a surprisingly robust digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Marketed as "not just a racing game," this driving sim from Competition Company and Teyon received overwhelmingly poor reviews. Reviews pointed out that the game felt unfinished in nearly every way, particularly in a year featuring high-quality racing experiences. In the eyes of critics, this sputtering stinker was best left unplayed.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the confusing punctuation is a silly annoyance. This compilation of retro mascot platformers revives a rude feline known for incessant quips. Reviewers noted that these games haven't aged well originally and haven't gotten better with age. The improbably high user score remains a curious contrast to the critical reception.

7. Hunter x Hunter: Nen x Impact

Metascore: 53, User Score: 3.5

This *Hunter x Hunter* fighter encountered harsh criticism from both reviewers and fans. It was lambasted for a thin character selection and a dearth of gameplay modes. Fan reaction was notably negative, with some expressing a desire that the title's flop would be a warning for future projects.

6. Neptunia Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, User Score: 5.3

Based on the anime-style Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this vehicle combat game tasks players with rounding up slime-like creatures. Reviewers felt that its effort to channel a unique gameplay loop ultimately fell flat, coming across as more of a cash grab than a substantial Neptunia game. Its brief runtime combined with a premium price raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a piece of lost media from the mid-2000s, finally released after a very long time in development hell. The team behind it made the decision to keep the game as an original artifact of its time, acknowledging that modern gamers might not appreciate its dated design. As such, many reviews concluded that the interesting history of its development was far richer than the game itself.

4. Scar-Lead

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-art third-person shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* fell flat with critics. Frequent criticisms centered on uninspired foes, samey environments, and a snoozy narrative. A controversial mechanic involving the protagonist's clothing was universally disliked and took away from the game's overall experience.

3. Ambulance Life

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Imagine the strategic surgery games of the past, then remove the compelling story. That, according to reviews, is pretty much *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the core gameplay loop to be a slog, and the story's portrayal of mental health topics was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, User Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic digital companion formula makes the franchise into a town-management title. The result, according to critics, was a dull series of repetitive tasks that rapidly became boring. Some reviews went so far as to declare it one of the worst titles available on its platform, noting a dearth of depth.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, User Score: 2.5

Intended to be a major GTA-style title from a ex-Rockstar veteran's industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a catastrophic disappointment. Reviews heavily criticized its weak action, uninspired storytelling, and a multitude of technical problems. Critics found it to be a downgrade compared to previous-generation games in the same genre. Amidst the overwhelming criticism, a tiny number of positive user reviews found fun in the experience, providing a rare contrast.

Written by

Stephanie Middleton

Elara is a seasoned betting analyst with over a decade of experience in the New Zealand market, specializing in sports and casino gaming insights.

BetNest NZ

Type to search articles.